NewsHans' BiographyTeam (Present & Past)DiscographyMediaArchivesJukeboxFan CoversAbout/Feedback
 SEARCH
 

 FAN COMMENTS
Rejected scores have gotten official releases before, such as Timeline by Jerry Goldsmith. So even if the Snyder Cut never gets released, I'd hope Junkie could potentially still work out a deal to get his original score out there. Keeping my fingers crossed.No Time to Die coming by Decca 27th March<br><br>https:// www.udiscovermusic.com/news/hans-zimmer-no- time-to-die-soundtrack/?fbclid=IwAR1UtjXatRpCQyXWJ9f7YYfT9Eb k5jy4d7XnlS6XzX4vTiOTxFfvQ0PWgaIIt all depends on whether WB releases the Snyder Cut OR no I don't even want to think about the other case & with the way things are going now it looks like we'll definitely get Zack Snyder's Justice League if not today then tomorrow and only then your question will have any meaning.<br>TL;DR the score will only happen after WB #ReleaseTheSnyderCutHybrid, Oscar Senen and Joan Martorell orchestrate the score ?Budapest, please :(
Same question here, is concert in Poland even concidered to occur?if the link doesn't work for some reason, the song is called Cliffhanger Sky High on youtubeHi All, sorry it took so long to upload, My friend helped me set up a youtube channel to upload tracks to. I am very inspired by the classic Zimmer Scores of the 90's. I envisioned A climactic rescue aboard A speeding train for this particular cue.<br>https://youtu.be/4WyMIcpqMRk <br>I avoided bringing up the TF films in this thread until AFTER you dragged them into it.<br>===============<br><br>No one dragged anything. <br><br>I briefly mentioned that franchise, among many other things you conveniently ignored (you do that a lot), to prove a simple point: that a director doesn't get to make 5 movies from the same franchise if people aren't enjoying his work. Simple as that. I never talked about the "quality" of each of those movies. Go see the comment again.<br><br>YOU picked up on this and started talking obsessively about the TF. <br><br><br>==============<br>Going after every person that doesn't like Bay and trying to obsessively "debunk" them is psychotic, yes. <br>==============<br><br>Look at your first comment here, pal. Look at it good! Snarky, dismissive, almost trollish, and with a clear intention to provoke people. Let me quote it: "Another day, another Bay film that doesn't know what fun is." <br><br>I only "go after" people who can't share their opinions in a respectful, mature way. There are a lot of comments here I disagreed with. But I never confronted those people. Why? Because they know how to properly share an opinion. <br><br>I only go after people who provoke, make fun of someone/something and troll. I've never "attacked" a person who didn't deserve that kind of response. My post history here speaks for itself. <br><br><br>===================<br>And constantly referring to other people's opinions and whinging about the box office doesn't make you objective, especially with how self-contradictory the latter has been.<br>===================<br><br>Nope. Not even close. <br><br>You're just bitter that I'm using quotes from proven, talented people like Spielberg who support Bay. What quotes can your side use? Just quotes from knucklehead film bloggers and critics who hate half of what Hollywood makes. <br><br>No one with an actual integrity and knowledge of the film business can dismiss what Bay has accomplished. You may not like his stuff, but to completely dismiss him as a filmmaker is.......moronic. Truth is, it's only small fries on the internet who are angry that their favorite mid-level directors aren't as big and successful as Bay.<br><br>That's really the bottom line. <br><br>Speaking of that, who is YOUR favorite filmmaker? Go ahead, share it with us. Let's see who is that PERFECT filmmaker you drool over.<br><br>I'm really curious.<br><br>==============<br>By your own "objective" reasoning, this would make them his worst films. But you don't acknowledge that, because you don't actually care about objectivity.<br>==============<br><br>Huh??<br><br>When did I said that box office success or box office failure means that a movie is good or bad?? I never that. So if you don't mind, stop putting words in my mouth.<br><br>Thank you. <br><br><br>==================<br>You care about faking it when it suits you, and chucking it when it doesn't<br>==================<br><br><br>Kinda ironic coming from the person who ignored the majority of the stuff I said here. Careful cherry-picking, convenient ignoring of stuff, and putting words in my mouth is apparently what you like to do. <br><br><br>================<br>What do you mean "next time?" Your first reply here was calling my opinion a joke.<br>================<br><br>Uhhhh, that's because it IS a joke. Because it is not true and because it was posted with the clear intention to provoke. You are the Negative Nancy here, my friend. Not me. Jesus Christ, even your nickname tells people exactly what they can expect from you......"Cynical Makooti". <br><br><br>====================<br>I didn't insult you for anything other than lying to win an argument<br>====================<br><br>Oh, that's true....................you're certainly not winning this argument. I mean, that's obvious. <br><br>And..... I never posted a lie. Just because "your sources" claim something different doesn't mean it's the truth. Pacific Rim wasn't a success - considering the huge expactations and the fact that the movie's budget is $200 freakin' million - and they DID try to start a franchise with 300. They failed. <br><br><br>================<br>Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.<br>================<br><br>That's rich. Coming from the guy who calls himself "Cynical Makooti". The guy who now plays the victim, even though he was the one who started this with a childish, trollish comment. <br><br>Look at my first reply to you. I was jokingly mimicking your style. Intentionally. Then you tried to be a smartass with your next reply. But EVEN THEN, I responded in a normal way with my second post. After that........you unleashed your true self. <br><br>And now, you're acting like the victim: "Poor me, being attacked by a crazy Bay fan!" <br><br>So please, don't talk about self-awareness. It ain't working.<br><br><br><br>================<br>Pacific Rim was a domestic bomb that turned things around with its international box office.<br>================<br><br>Haha, maybe you should read more Forbes. Take a look at what they said about the entire (already failed) Pac Rim universe. Read a bit more on how much money the studio lost from the first flick and why they actually went with a sequel. It ain't because the first one was a beloved hit. <br><br><br>=======<br>The Last Knight lost about $100M according to Paramount themselves. That doesn't sound like an international success to me.<br>=======<br><br>Okay, I believe you. Now, would you please share the link to that statement from Paramount. <br><br>Thank you. <br><br><br>=============<br>Maybe it does to you, but I can't speak for that little fantasy world you seem to be living in right now.<br>=============<br><br>Hey, it's certainly a better and more reasonable place than your world. A world where you completely dismiss and ignore the accomplishments of one of the biggest filmmakers out there.<br><br>What's your next claim? <br><br>That Donnie Trump is the best President in history?<br><br><br>Have a nice day!Do any of you think that Junkie's Justice League score will ever get released or leaked? I was really excited to hear how Junkie planned on developing the themes used in the prior DCEU movies. Especially the Batman themes from BVS. It's a damn shame how WB handled that film.
"Why do Bay naysayers pretend that Bay only directs TF movies? It's very interesting...... Pretty much all complaints against Bay are connected to the TF movies.<br><br>Newsflash: Bay was a proven and very successful action filmmaker wayyyyyyyyyyyyy before TF1."<br><br>Newsflash: I avoided bringing up the TF films in this thread until AFTER you dragged them into it.  Only then did I treat them as fair game.  Considering they make up a third of his filmography, I don't see why I SHOULDN'T address them.  How convenient is it that bringing them up is only ever valid when YOU do it?<br><br>More to the point, I already said I thought his decline kicked in from Pearl Harbor onwards.  The TF films are just his rock bottom.<br><br>"So let me get this straight: trying to be as objective as possible, in a non-threating way, quoting people who actually know what they're talking about and certainly not treating my opinion as fact, makes me......psychotic."<br><br>Going after every person that doesn't like Bay and trying to obsessively "debunk" them is psychotic, yes.  And constantly referring to other people's opinions and whinging about the box office doesn't make you objective, especially with how self-contradictory the latter has been.<br><br>Pain & Gain and 13 Hours, his supposedly best films, also have his lowest box office turnouts.  13 Hours was a flat-out bomb.  By your own "objective" reasoning, this would make them his worst films.  But you don't acknowledge that, because you don't actually care about objectivity.<br><br>You care about faking it when it suits you, and chucking it when it doesn't.<br><br>"Next time, I'll just act like a complete jerk, insulting everyone and everything."<br><br>What do you mean "next time?"  Your first reply here was calling my opinion a joke.  You already have this method down.  You're just too dishonest to admit it.<br><br>Notice how I avoided accusing you of anything until AFTER you started outright lying about movies and flaunting it as objective fact.<br><br>You insulted ME first, pal.  I didn't insult you for anything other than lying to win an argument.  Not for your opinions, not for your celebrity crush, for being a disingenuous twat. <br><br>Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.<br><br>"Reviews, RT scores, and crappy film blog "think pieces" are also not proof of quality."<br><br>Then it's a good thing I never quoted a single one of those, let alone as objective proof, isn't it?<br><br>Man, appeal to authority, appeal to popularity, mistaking correlation for causation, slothful induction, strawmanning, I could make a bingo game outta this.<br><br>"So that flick, according to you, turned a profit.......but TLK - budget of also $200 million and with a worldwide gross of $605 million..........is a bomb?"<br><br>Not "according to me."  According to the studios that make the actual films.  And Forbes.  Remember Forbes?  You considered their word inarguable fact a couple posts ago.<br><br>https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2013/09/02/pacif ic-rim-and-more-domestic-flops-that-became-global-hits/#3f3e 914d7c18<br><br>Well whaddaya know?<br><br>Pacific Rim was a domestic bomb that turned things around with its international box office.<br><br>That thing you said TF5 was but actually wasn't.<br><br>The Last Knight lost about $100M according to Paramount themselves.  That doesn't sound like an international success to me.<br><br>Maybe it does to you, but I can't speak for that little fantasy world you seem to be living in right now.<br><br>Wow!  Just wow!ThxSeville, The Bait, Ambrose Welcomes Nyah, Chimera Myth, Beach Fight, Ambrose Dies.Can we stop? I agree with the other guy more in his points, but it's clear that this is gonna keep going nowhere if you're gonna be so overly defensive about something that you claim is merely subjective.But here we are, calling dog-humping, Decepticon testicles, and mommy-on-pot-brownies "challenging the viewer."<br>======================<br><br><br>Why do Bay naysayers pretend that Bay only directs TF movies? It's very interesting...... Pretty much all complaints against Bay are connected to the TF movies.<br><br>Newsflash: Bay was a proven and very successful action filmmaker wayyyyyyyyyyyyy before TF1. <br><br>So no, "challenging the viewer" is not about Transformers. You chose to focus on these movies. Not me. I was actually reffering to Bay movies like The Island and especially Pain and Gain. <br><br>But I guess you like to talk only about Transformers.....Good for you. But that's not how a discussion works. <br><br><br>===================<br>Instead of accepting that your love of Bay is nothing more than a opinion, just as my claim that he misses the point of what makes action movies fun is, you turn into an overly-defensive nut, desperately quoting every opinion piece under the sun to pretend your opinion is some statistically-backed fact. I've seen you do this every time someone talks shit about Bay around here. It's psychotic.<br>===================<br><br><br>So let me get this straight: trying to be as objective as possible, in a non-threating way, quoting people who actually know what they're talking about and certainly not treating my opinion as fact, makes me......psychotic? <br><br>Wow! Just wow!<br><br>Next time, I'll just act like a complete jerk, insulting everyone and everything. For you, that is apparently the normal behavior.<br><br><br>======<br>Bad movies make money. Everyone knows that, and everyone knows that's not proof of quality.<br>=======<br><br>Reviews, RT scores, and crappy film blog "think pieces" are also not proof of quality. Also, a "bad" movie to you is the greatest movie for the guy walking next to you on the street. As Kevin Smith said: "Every movie is someone's favorite movie". <br><br>Let's try to keep that in mind.<br><br><br>============<br>That's not just a domestic bomb, that's a bomb altogether.<br>============<br><br>Really?<br><br>Then what do you have to say about Pacific Rim 1. I present to you.......the pure numbers:<br><br>Budget: $200 million. And that doesn't include the marketing cost.<br>Worldwide gross: $411,002,906<br><br>So that flick, according to you, turned a profit.......but TLK - budget of also $200 million and with a worldwide gross of $605 million..........is a bomb?<br><br>Wow! Just.....wow!
Yeah lol back then only Harold was confirmed.Can you tell me a names of cues, that was been on Klaus website?Formality indeed. Complicated ! lol<br><br>You can bet Blake Neely didn't need anyone to "write" those 10 seconds !! lolI always found these credits to be a bit confusing. Klaus Badelt is credited on almost every cue, even when his themes don't appear and another additional composer is credited as well. I thought maybe it was just a formality that Zimmer and Badelt were credited everywhere (I mean, how much could they be involved on a cue like "Welcome to the Caribbean"?), but then "No real ship" and "Sword Fight Pt. 2" have no Badelt for some reason. Does someone know a bit more about this?well the composer confirmed he is working on it to be released very soon<br>
Latest

Please install Flash®
and turn on Javascript.


Rate those CD:
Top 50





  2010, August 11
Burbank, CA

Due to the overwhelming success of Inception: Music From The Motion Picture -— Oscar-winning film composer Hans Zimmer’s dramatic score to the blockbuster sci-fi actioner Inception, Warner Bros. Records will make available two previously unreleased bonus tracks to fans who sign up via email at the soundtrack’s website www.inceptionscore.com.

The two bonus tracks, “Projections” and “Don’t Think About Elephants,” will go live at noon PT on Thursday, August 12th.




Create Topic

Pages << 1 2 >>

Stevie reply Replies: 0 || 2012-01-02 02:30:26
If not for your wtiirng this topic could be very convoluted and oblique.

Nicola from italy reply Replies: 0 || 2011-03-16 00:00:00
Thanks Hans for all your beautiful songs!!

But where is the song listen when Mr. Charles is talking with Fisher in the bar at the hotel?

i think it's the best song of the film i need to listen it every time!!

PLEASE RELEASE IT I WILL BUY IT!

Nicolas, Webmaster reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-26 00:00:00
@ Igor ;
Hans is not planning to be there for the moment :)

Sparktank reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-24 00:00:00
I LOVE the new bonus tracks!! ^_^
Even though they're in MP3, they'res still awesome as ever!!!
Just wish there was a lossless release of the bonus tracks, then it'd make a perfect version of the soundtrack :D

MIKEL reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-21 00:00:00
What a soundtrack this is. Up to now my favourite H.Z. soundtrack was The Thin Red Line but now.. well the music for Inception is incredible, I just love it. As I have not as yet seen the Film I am in the lucky position to be able to create my own visuals in my head to this fantastic music. The bonus tracks are also a wonderful relevation and really add to the overall album.
Thanks Hans, another stormer.

Igor reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-19 00:00:00
Hi, i have seen that Hans is nominated for 2 awards at the 10th World Soundtrack Award in Gent, Belgium. The award show is on the 23-10-2010. Does anybody know he will attend that show? Because of the 10th anniversary of this show there will be a giant concert after the show. It would be great if Hans would make a part of this concert.

Mr Arguello reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-19 00:00:00
Nice tunes.

I was hoping to find the music that plays at the hotel BAR scene where DiCaprio talks to Cillian about the strangeness of the dream... I'm pretty sure it's not on the OST... nor these two new bonus songs...
Hope they'll release the one I'm talking about!

ARM reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-15 00:00:00
If you redownload the cues, you should get the proper length:
Projections - 7:04
Don't Think About Elephants - 5:35

I had to insert a different email address (just added a '1' to mine) in order to download the corrected file.

BTW, I convered the Inception live suite that was on ustream to a 22 min 320kb mp3 (removed the interview segments for score only) - sound quality is fantastic (low frequency cut off, that's all). Now I have an 85+ min Inception score I listen to!

Adrian reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-15 00:00:00
@ ARM,

Thanks for the tip, it worked for me too!

TGnNV reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-14 00:00:00
Great news! Thanks for the extra tracks! Listening to this soundtrack puts me right back into the scenes from the film.
I hope there's an Oscar nomination...and win...for the Inception score.

OMG reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
I was hoping for the spinning hallway fight music :(

The zero-grav fight music is quite similar, but lacks the awesome descending three-note motif opening of the spinning hallway sequence.

Goddamnit Hans, give us a proper expanded release ;)

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
I think projections actually starts after the opening titles, half remembered dream, then transfers to another scene.

Alex reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
@ Hybrid

Thank you.

Looking forward to listening to them.

Does anyone know of any other unreleased cues ?

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
@ last poster. Yep I believe it is. The track starts when they fly over the city and includes the fight. It's a much cooler track then Projections.

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
Nice! The "Elephants" track is from the hallway scene when Arthur fights the projections, right?

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-13 00:00:00
The track is fixed by the way. It's now 5:36 long.

Yay :)

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
I was hoping for the music when cobb was talking to his kids on the phone before he runs into saito again

Me reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
@MV
Dark Lord of Ghostwriters HANS ZIMMER...


Ghostwriter:
–noun
a person who writes one or numerous speeches, books, articles, etc., for another person who is named as or presumed to be the author.


That's a fallacy, and you know it, just look at the ten thousand names in the additional music credits list of his soundtracks.

It's in your right to hate the man or his music, but don't be a "fabulist".

Excuse my grammar, English is not my first language.

Alex reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
Any information on how to register or sign up ?

Hybrid Soldier reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
I guess it's the same system as Angels & Demons.

Means at noon you can register there and receive the tracks by email (like H2O for A&D).

Bogusz reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
Hybrid Solider - I don't understand it... how we should register and when?

Kusi81 reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
....

at 12:00pm PST

...

;-)

Bogusz reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
Love you :)

Hybrid Soldier reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
It's available !

8 min of new music !

Go to the site now ! :)

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
My "Dont think about elephants" track seems to be cut short... anyone else have this prob? Track cuts off at 1:16. Anyone know the full length of the track? Maybe I'll have to download it again...

Bou reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
my "elephants" track has the same problem

Kusi81 reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
... yeah mine too, I put the track between the two first regular album tracks... it works for a while ;-)

Anonymous reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
Yeps there seems to be something wrong with the second track. They probably didn't rip it probably (it ripped with iTunes says the file).

Also the Projections music is way different in the movie. Here it's basically the same track with a beat under it.

I'm slightly disappointed. I hoped for a lot more cool stuff directly from the movie and I hope they fix the track that is cut off...

ironbourne reply Replies: 0 || 2010-08-12 00:00:00
Maybe the "Elephants" track was cut short purposely, almost as if it were supposed to be followed by another different track...a hint at a possible expanded release?

I agree with you on the "Projections" track, I was hoping for something new, like the hotel fight with Arthur and the projections or that amazing track from when Cobb is pretending to be Mr. Charles and walking with Fischer through the hotel rooms (the one that sounds like the first half of Mombasa except quieter and with a One Simple Idea feel to it?)

Pages << 1 2 >>

 HANS-ZIMMER.com© 2001-2018 OST 
Inception soundrack : Warner Bros. Records will make available two previously unreleased bonus tracks to fans